Challenge of Writing Your Own Essay - One of the Greatest Challenges

Challenge of Writing Your Own Essay - One of the Greatest ChallengesThe greatest challenge of Beng An educated woman is writing her own essay. However, if you are very good at writing, you could possibly take on this task with ease.A white schoolgirl is usually not even allowed to enter a different school because the culture deems her as corrupt. However, in terms of education, Beng educated women are also considered as such. Therefore, if you want to write your own essay about anything, the first step that you have to do is to become educated.Although you can take out English classes at your place of study, if you are not a good enough writer, you can also take classes online to learn how to write. Online English class offers a lot of benefits as you will get to get the entire knowledge of writing only from the comfort of your home. Another great advantage that you can get is that you can get a chance to meet many other people who have the same interest as you do.Self-improvement is one of the most important things for a successful life. Beng educated women can actually achieve it in their lifetime if they always strive for it. You can try to improve yourself and what you are doing by joining many online communities. Here, you will get to meet a lot of people who are doing similar things as you are and learn how to adapt to the situation.Beng educated women must have the desire to improve their lives and self-improvement in general. If you are always at home in silence, you will never accomplish your goal. However, one of the best ways to do it is to get more education. So, be smart and go online to search for essay samples.There are many online stores who offer essay samples for sale. These essays usually include a sample paper that you can follow in order to practice writing for an essay. By doing this, you will start learning how to write your own essay. So, when you can write a whole paper, you will be able to practice it and eventually master it.Online wr iters who want to compete with each other can also join some forums where topics like essay samples are discussed. In such forums, you will be able to get a chance to network with other writers and learn the techniques that will be useful in writing essays. There are a lot of tips available in these forums that will definitely help you out in writing your own essay.

Diversity And Diversity For A Company - 873 Words

Diversity is a key contributor in today’s workforce. Many factors effect diversity and there are guidelines a company can follow to ensure it is diverse. Diversity and inclusion can be tools to create a competitive advantage for a company and can help solve issues by looking at problems from different perspectives. It also contributes to the employees by allowing for work with many types of people. According to Phillips and Gully (2014) â€Å"Diversity awareness enables you to hire, retain and motivate the best talent, which will help maximize you and your organization’s performance.† A diverse workforce can also help to attract more applicants to the business. A company can go about ensuring diversity in a number of ways. First, the talent must be attracted. Then, the development of the talent must be carefully monitored. Lastly, the talent must be retained. In a study completed by Forbes Insights (2011), it found 65 percent of the companies surveyed had a solid recruitment plan in place to attract employees, but then fell to 53 percent in development and 44 percent in retention. In order to ensure an ongoing diversity process, improvements must be made to better development and retain diverse employees. While a solid recruitment plan can yield great results, the possibility of high turnover and less diversity can still be an issue. Inclusion is one way to help the development and retention of an employee. Suffice to say diversity and inclusion go hand in hand. As stated inShow MoreRelatedDiversity And Diversity Within Your Company1398 Words   |  6 Pageseducate, and promote diversity within your company. Your company will be shown t he merits of diversity and how diversity within your organization can be a benefit. This paper will be broken down into three main areas: Benefits of Diversity, Challenges of Diversity, and Recommendations for an effective diversity within your organization.. Before we move on it is important to take the time and think what diversity means to your organization. How does your company define diversity? A simple definitionRead MoreDiversity On The Walgreens Company1683 Words   |  7 PagesDiversity on the Walgreens Company Website The Walgreens Drug Store Company has about 8100 stores in all America, which makes the store very accessible to the public. The Walgreens stores are located deeper in the communities and touch many lives. The company employs about 251,000 workers with more than 70,000 healthcare providers (Walgreens Diversity Inclusion Report, 2014). Diversity in this company is very important due to the widespread in the community and the higher number of workers. EveryoneRead MoreDiversity For Success Of The Company1036 Words   |  5 Pagesit successfully handles diversity in the workforce. The author argues that in the current workforce, which is diverse, the challenge is exclusion. The book has compiled extensive current information on social policy trends, legislative and demographic, as well as the analysis of causes and effects of workforce exclusion, and reveals that learning about how to manage the issue of diversity is critical. Therefore, based on the extensive information offered touch ing on diversity in the workplace, I willRead MoreThe Issues Of Diversity For Success Of The Company1037 Words   |  5 Pagesit successfully handles diversity in the workforce. The author argues that in the current workforce, which is diverse, the challenge is exclusion. The book compiles extensive current information on social policy trends, legislative and demographic, as well as the analysis of causes and effects of workforce exclusion, and reveals that learning about how to manage the issue of diversity is critical. Therefore, based on the extensive information offered touching on diversity in the workplace, I willRead MoreHow Diversity And Teamwork Of A Company850 Words   |  4 Pagesfind with any amount of labor diversity, and we must all make efforts so that the structure and organization of the company will not collapse because of this situation. While it is true, this topic diversity is very delicate and can be misunderstandings to adversely impact on productivity and t eamwork of a company. According to the Article â€Å"How diversity works† states â€Å"DIVERSITY is NOT ONLY about bringing different perspectives to the table. Simply adding social diversity to a group makes people believeRead MoreDiversity Leadership And Diversity Challenges Faced By Companies And Institutions Of All Sizes2129 Words   |  9 Pagesthere is an increasing focus on diversity leadership and diversity challenges faced by companies and institutions of all sizes. Chin and Trimble (2015) acknowledged that diversity has actually created the path to globalization; populations are evolving to being more heterogeneous and diversity issues are increasingly more global and diverse. Ewijk (2011) related diversity to differences between people, adding that there are three fundamental elements in defining diversity. Firstly, it the selection modesRead MoreThe Diversity Of The Multicultural Company, And Australia And China923 Words   |  4 PagesThis essay has discussed what the challenge of working are in the multicultural company, and Australia and China are the specific countries to be focused on. This essay concluded various factors that may affect workplace behaviour in a cross-cultural environment such as diversity, multiculturalism, ethnocentrism, stereotypes, cultural differences, barriers and cultural intelligence will be discussed. Furthermore, analyse the differences in national cultures and differences in political, social andRead MoreThe Diversity Of City : A News Media Company1233 Words   |  5 PagesThe purpose of this paper is to assess the diversity of city where a news media company recently hired me: Irvine, California. The city of Irvine has recently grown rapidly with people of diverse backgrounds. According to the U.S. Census Bureau (CHECK APA CITATION STYLE), census data from American FactFinder display exact statistics about Irvine’s population diversity. Currently, though the city’s White population totals 107,215 and thus dominates in terms of race, the Asian population comes in secondRead MoreUps Promotes Diversity Within Its Company Ess ay1492 Words   |  6 Pagesmillennial employees at the company (Martin personal interview, 2016). The last manager that the writer interviewed, Gary Overstreet, expressed concerns over the lost control of HR costs, and the repetition of many of the same ongoing HR issues that have led to company lawsuits (Overstreet personal interview, 2016). UPS promotes diversity within its company literature. United Parcel Service describes diversity as impacting its company on a global aspect. Diversity is a key issue in many of UPS’sRead MoreThe Importance Of Cultural Diversity For Company Success1274 Words   |  6 Pages(understand the importance of being honest, ethical and fair) and diversity (understand the importance of cultural diversity for company success). (Adidas Careers, 2015) Corporate Governance and Risk Management Adidas, being a multi-national enterprise contributes decently towards the global economy and society. They are aware of the laws, rules and regulations (formal institution) in addition to putting efforts to become a globally socially responsible firm. A group named Social and Environmental

Saskatchewan doctor shortages Humanism vs. Structuralism

Government more recently has thrown money at the problem. Believing that money can solve any problem. The ministry of health consulted with physicians and health care stakeholders to create initiates to help attract more physicians to Saskatchewan (â€Å"Physician Recruitment,†2010). The government signed new contracts with emergency rooms doctors in hope that higher salaries will help recruit more physicians (â€Å"Saskatchewan ER,† 2013). The expected salaries range from about 300,000 to 400,0000 yearly (â€Å"Saskatchewan ER,† 2013). The government has also committed a total of 3.5 million dollars to a new strategy (â€Å"Physician Recruitment†, 2010). Government grants also seemed to be a new and innovative way of combating the lack of doctors (Kaul,†¦show more content†¦The vacant positions need to be filled by new â€Å"cogs† and the physicians will do this is if they receive lots of money (Phillips, 2014). Money isn’t always w hat is going to draw people to work in Saskatchewan (Kaul, 2013). It could be the lifestyle, opportunities and many other aspects (Kaul, 2013). They may have come to the country to provide their family with a better life and opportunity but to the government they are just here to work. The humanist theory is the direct opposite of the structuralism theory. It states that in order to have success we have to pay attention to workers as individuals and their identifiable needs beyond material rewards (Kaul, 2013). Maslow’s hierarchy shows that even when once level is fulfilled individuals will always want to obtain the next level because that’s the nature of people in Maslow’s opinion (Oleson, 2004). Even if the doctor comes to Canada and has all the money in the world he might not have his family with him and he might miss them. Which then he isn’t fulfilling a level of the hierarchy and one cannot move higher up without fulfilling lower levels (Oleson, 2004). So governments should look at other aspects that can affect the decisions of physicians to stay and work in Saskatchewan (Oleson, 2004). Some rural communities lack the cultural aspects that some doctors might need if they come from other countries (â€Å"Physician Recruitment,â₠¬  2010). Some might have families, which have needs of their own (â€Å"Physician

Martin Luther King and Crito free essay sample

While this may have led to a degree of congruence between the arguments of both men, their drastic contrast in opinion concerning the appropriate method by which to carry out an act of political protest must be given sufficient attention. Indeed, while the two men share a similar drive towards promoting political protest, their definition of the concept seems to have differed to a high degree. In comparing and contrasting these historically consequential opinions, we can better understand the various methods by which an act of political objection may be committed, and we may also reason as to how both methods are applicable in their own right. To begin, Socrates and King each spend time in prison within their works, with King in the Birmingham Jail and Socrates residing in a Greek prison. Not only were they imprisoned, but both men also refuse to give up their arguments in exchange for their escape. Thus, it may be stated, that each man is imprisoned because he is in pursuit of a betterment of society, and the powers at be feel their vision of society to be in conflict with the prisoners own. In addition, both men are aware that they may be illegally freed through a variety of activities, with King noting that many of his followers proceeded to follow him to Birmingham, and Crito ensuring Socrates that assistance in his escape was at no great cost. Perhaps, these three situational commonalities (that of imprisonment, pursuit of a better society, and the ability to physically free oneself), offer an explanation for the similar characteristics they proceed to embrace in their approach to political objection. One major similarity in the approach of both is that they develop their ideas around the premise of critical thought. In any argument, they each promote contemplation and conversation over direct action. In committing cts of political objection, it is not as if Socrates and Ma rtin Luther King advocate rioting, coups, or physical resistance. Rather, quite the opposite is the case. We find that in the scene of Socrates arrival to prison, Socrates is increasingly tentative with his determined friend, telling him that, I am extremely desirous to be persuaded by you, but not against my own better judgment. Socrates may have felt the impulse to escape his imprisonment, but his principles allowed him to defeat his self-betrayal by thinking critically about the consequences of his jailbreak. King, to the same effect, delayed any direct action in Birmingham so that he could meet with business owners in the city and discuss racial problems, attempting to reach a form of compromise. By these actions, he tried to avert any disastrous consequences that direct action might cause. It was only after King had, in his words had, been the victim of a broken promise, that he decided to perpetuate any directly confrontational activity. In order to pursue a better society, it is logical that cooperation and contemplation would have to precede direct confrontation, so that bridges are not burned and bonds can be made to last into the proposed future. Both King and Socrates aim to lead in the direction, not of violence to one extreme or inaction to another, but rather towards deliberation and non-violent resistance. King attests to this when he writes that, The way of nonviolence became an integral part in our struggle. Without this principle of nonviolent demonstration, King believes that, many streets of the South would, I am convinced, be flowing with blood. The structure of civil society had to be maintained so that the populace would associate to a sense of peace and order. If chaos were to occur, King and Socrates would be blamed by the established powers, and with their names tarnished they would be ignored, never attaining the opportunity to implement their ideas. While the similarities entailed above are ind icative of the fact that King and Socrates maneuvered towards political objection from parallel beginnings, we must now turn to the undeniable differences in principle that King and Socrates pursued. Socrates makes his final claim to righteousness, and it becomes increasingly apparent that he blames individuals, not the law, for his unjust persecution. Socrates does not argue that the laws are to blame, but rather that the leaders themselves have manipulated the laws to convict him. Indeed, he does not support the system that the leaders have constructed, fundamentally revoking it for a system related to a higher order. He supports certain absolutes like justice, which have been constructed into the tenants that make up the original Athenian law. In such a view of society, laws and individuals must be considered in two different realms. Opposition then is not against the entirety of society, rather it is against the lawmakers of the society in question, and the laws themselves are justified at their core. This is a consequential finding, certainly one that comes into direct conflict with Martin Luther Kings form of protest. According to Martin Luther King, multiple factors, including unjust laws, are to blame for the injustices being perpetrated against African-Americans. At some great length, King writes about the white moderate, and how few members of the oppressor race can understand the deep groans and passionate yearnings of the oppressed race, and still fewer have the vision to see that injustice must be rooted out by strong, persistent and determined action. It is clear to King that the white moderate empowerment, and its unwillingness to perpetuate a more equal society, plays a major factor in the injustice of society. In concordance with this statement, King realizes that the white moderate is responsible for the drafting of laws within society. Not only do whites make decisions regarding the affect and implementation of laws at the time that he writes, indeed, whites have made the laws for African-Americans through all of modern American history. Thus, because we know through painful experience that freedom is never voluntarily given by the oppressor†, we can interpret that King sees both the white moderate and the laws they draft and support as equally unjust. For, if the oppressor never gives freedom voluntarily, then the rules conceived by the oppressor will have at their core the principle of oppression and inequality. The leaders and the laws are tied together in an inescapable fashion. This is the principle in which we truly find the most important difference between Kings and Socrates definition of, and deliverance of, political dissent. As stated, the principle of absolute justice is of the highest importance to both Socrates and Martin Luther King, Jr. , and yet the processes by which both participate in political arguments to maintain this principle are opposite in their methods. The argument can be simplified by making the assertion that Socrates, with his distinction between unjust leaders and just laws, refuses to break a law due to the unjust nature of such an action. In his argument, there can be no justification for breaking a law, for breaking such a law constitutes an unjust act. Martin Luther King, on the other hand, maintains absolute justice by advocating for the breaking of laws that are inherently unequal, he held both the individuals and the laws accountable for racial injustice, and that his method of political protest would reflect this point. Essentially, oppressive leaders make laws that oppress, and because King has a vision of an absolute justice that supersedes both the oppressive laws and individuals, he is able to politically dispute against both. In such a manner, he fully advocates the breaking of unjust laws. Thus, Socrates and Martin Luther King, Jr. were each, in their own right, pursuing a better society through the quest for absolute justice and the implementation of political argument. For Socrates, this meant staying true to a judicial code, and not acting against laws that he felt placed justice at their core. For King, this meant causing civil disturbances to disrupt the State, aimed at rearranging the principles of both the unjust individuals and the unequal laws associated with society. In either case, one may reason that the means and motives by which both men went about objecting were rational in their own instances, and the consequences of their actions brought about the eventual betterment of society through civil justice.